{ { { who am I? worldly»about me. what's with the grasshopper? random»why sbg. not inside frames? reload. } } }

{ Thursday, April 17, 2003 }

6:59 AM | link

On April 17th (today!), join Austin area residents at Quack's on 411 E. 43rd St to celebrate the anniversary of web site bookcrossing.com. The concept behind the site is that you take a book you've read, register it at the site, put an identifying label on the book, then leave the book in a public place for someone else to find and enjoy.

To celebrate this anniversary, Austin BookCrossers will have tons of books available for you to take home with you and enjoy...for FREE! We only ask that if you take a book, you visit the bookcrossing.com web site to let us know what you think of the book and whether you've released it into the wild again. We love to see the journey of each little message in a bottle!

If you have a book you'd like to release at the event, bring it by and we'll tag it with a label. Better yet, sign up before you come and tag it yourself so you can track its journey all over the world!

When: Thursday, April 17th, 10:30 am - 8:30 pm
Where: Quack's, 411 E. 43rd St (map)
What: Free books!
Why: Because shared books are happy books

{ Friday, April 11, 2003 }

10:29 AM | link

I finally saw The Pianist last night. Humans are capable of such cruelty.

It's a good movie. You should see it.

{ Monday, April 07, 2003 }

6:25 PM | link

I released 6 more books this weekend at Trianon, Texpresso, and Bark 'n Purr. For my fellow BookCrossers, I've set up a page of tips and techniques for releasing books in the wild.

Have you freed any good books lately?

{ Sunday, April 06, 2003 }

4:29 PM | link

The first American conscientious objector from the Iraq war gave himself up at a marine base earlier this week. [via follow me here]
[Stephen Eagle Funk] became concerned about the reasons for the conflict in Iraq. "This war is very immoral because of the deception involved by our leaders. It is very hypocritical...War is about destruction and violence and death. It is young men fighting old men's wars. It is not the answer, it just ravages the land of the battleground. I know it's wrong but other people in the military have been programmed to think it is OK."

8:44 AM | link

I heart Molly Ivins:
And of course we are all happy to learn that the Bush administration plans to provide universal health care and massive school construction for postwar Iraq, while simultaneously cutting health and education funding here at home.

Those of you who feel an impulse to raise your hand and ask, "Uh, what about us?" are just being selfish. If we get universal health care and massive school construction (between one-third and one-half of all American schools are somewhere between dilapidated and flat falling apart), why then, Bush couldn't afford to give a $350 billion tax cut to the richest 1 percent of Americans. You see how selfish you're being?

{ Saturday, April 05, 2003 }

8:49 AM | link

Over at Seeing the Forest, Dave has posted quite a few articles about voting machines. There are serious concerns about how reliable and secure the machines are:
Critics of such systems say that they are vulnerable to tampering, to human error and to computer malfunctions -- and that they lack the most obvious protection, a separate, paper receipt that a voter can confirm after voting and that can be recounted if problems are suspected..."They're avoiding computational realities. That's the computer science part of it. We can't avoid it any more than physical scientists can avoid gravity."
Not only that, but Dave points out that these voting machine companies are owned by or being bought up by right-wing interests. Just one example is Chuck Hagel in Nebraska:
Republican U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel was the head of, and continues to own part interest in, the company that owns the company that installed, programmed, and largely ran the voting machines that were used by most of the citizens of Nebraska.
Travis County recently switched over to electronic voting machines called "eSlates" made by a company called Hart InterCivic. So I decided to do a little research and find out which political campaigns the board members of the company had donated to:I found no record of contributions by any other board members. For Fred R. Lummis II, I also found records of a Fred R. Lummis, Jr. (also in Houston) giving money to the same campaigns. I can't tell if it's the same person, so I didn't count them.

It is disconcerting that none of the board members gave to non-Republican campaigns. I'm going to email the Travis County Elections division and Hart InterCivic headquarters to ask that they provide a paper receipt from their eSlate machines.

{ Friday, April 04, 2003 }

10:10 PM | link

Damn you again, Bill Moyers. This week he interviewed Greg Mitchell from the magazine Editor & Publisher about how the media is reporting on this war.
Edward R. Murrow had a quote on his wall in his office from Thoreau in which he said to speak the truth, you need two people. One to speak it and one to hear it. And I think that sums up the relationship not only between the military and the press but the press and the American people. You know, the press often is reporting factual matters. And the public sometimes turns away from it. We entered this war, with upwards of half the people in the country believing that Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/11 attack...how did that happen?

Was that the media's fault? Was it the government's fault for putting out the stories? Or is the public sometimes not receptive so that the media can expose things? ...the public wants to believe what the public wants to believe.
So what's the answer to this great chicken-and-egg story? Did our attention spans wane long before this war was even a twinkle in Bush's eye? Or has this culture of conglomerated, big-money media caused us to lose interest?

A friend suggested to me that perhaps it's mostly the latter case. In their quest to sell the sodas and clothes and movies and sports that they also own, Big Media gives us frequent ad breaks that shorten our attention spans. And when they do report the "news", they're more likely to relay the latest gossip about Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck than the harsh realities of a war.

When our children grow up in a society where the biggest debate is why Russell Crowe broke up with his last fling, how can we expect them to be capable of intelligently weighing matters of life and death? Why should we be surprised that they would rather watch fluff pieces? We've taught them not to care about anything more.

p.s. You can use this form to tell the FCC to protect media diversity.

{ Thursday, April 03, 2003 }

10:30 PM | link

An American citizen is being held in a federal prison, but the US government has not charged him with a crime. All of the evidence used against him has been sealed by a federal court at the request of the Department of Justice. His "crime" is that he gave money to a legitimate organization that the Department of Justice has now decided to classify as a terrorist organization.
Mike Hawash is one of us. He is an American who just happens to be Muslim and of Middle Eastern descent. The authorities have in no way proved that Mr. Hawash has committed any crime or that he is a flight risk. They have, by all appearances, simply snatched him up and put him in jail.
So please contact your representatives and ask that the US government charge Mr. Hawash with a crime, have him testify in court as a material witness as quickly as possible, or release Mr. Hawash. [via BookBlog]

And don't forget: we can owe our thanks to the Patriot Act for bringing us situations like this! We better work our asses off to stop Patriot Act II.