{ { { who am I? worldly»about me. what's with the grasshopper? random»why sbg. not inside frames? reload. } } }

{ Monday, March 31, 2003 }

8:09 PM | link

A letter to America from Margaret Atwood, one of my favorite authors:
You're gutting the Constitution. Already your home can be entered without your knowledge or permission, you can be snatched away and incarcerated without cause, your mail can be spied on, your private records searched. Why isn't this a recipe for widespread business theft, political intimidation, and fraud? I know you've been told all this is for your own safety and protection, but think about it for a minute. Anyway, when did you get so scared? You didn't used to be easily frightened...

If you proceed much further down the slippery slope, people around the world will stop admiring the good things about you. They'll decide that your city upon the hill is a slum and your democracy is a sham, and therefore you have no business trying to impose your sullied vision on them. They'll think you've abandoned the rule of law. They'll think you've fouled your own nest.

The British used to have a myth about King Arthur. He wasn't dead, but sleeping in a cave, it was said; in the country's hour of greatest peril, he would return. You, too, have great spirits of the past you may call upon: men and women of courage, of conscience, of prescience. Summon them now, to stand with you, to inspire you, to defend the best in you. You need them.

{ Saturday, March 29, 2003 }

3:07 PM | link

Isn't local TV news the best? And boy, do they know how to treat customers with respect!
From: Shiny Blue Grasshopper
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:08 PM
To: news36@kxan.com
Subject: Protest coverage

Do you think you could have spent more than 30 seconds on the anti-war protests? Do you realize how many Austinites have a very big problem with this war?

FOX7 and KVUE at least interviewed the protestors.

Do your job.

Sincerely,
Kelly Holmes
Granted, I wasn't very polite. But how come I'm not allowed to be the pissy customer for once? Here's the response I got:
From: <so-and-so>@KXAN.com

Dear Ms. Holmes ...

Hmmm. Yes, some of the later newscasts had short coverage. But, we covered it live at 5 p.m. at 6 p.m. yesterday. In our 6 o'clock, we had a full interview with UT Prof. Dana Cloud, the organizer of most of the recent events. I don't know what else we could have done to make you happy.

We are doing our job.

It's interesting how I'll respond to your email, the next email is from somebody on the opposite side of the issue wondering why we are covering the protests at all!

Keep watching. At the end of the day, I think you'll know that we are providing balanced coverage. We strive for that.

Sincerely,
<so-and-so>
Managing Editor
I'll tell you what else you could have done to make me happy:
  1. Run the same supposedly thorough story at 10:00 that you ran at 5:00 and 6:00.
  2. Don't start a response to a viewer with "Hmmm."
  3. Treat me like a customer, dammit.

1:56 PM | link

I'm officially fed up with Hotmail. I just paid $30 for a year of web-based e-mail service through spamcop.net. So if you'd like to reach me from now on, I'm at shinybluegrasshopper@spamcop.net.

{ Friday, March 28, 2003 }

9:28 PM | link

Damn you, Bill Moyers. Every time I watch your show, you get me all riled up.

We've all heard about the dividend tax cut and how it puts more money in the hands of the shareholders. Mr. Moyers & Co. interviewed a typical Citigroup shareholder, who would end up with an extra $32 each year. Woohoo. On the other hand, the CEO of Citigroup would get over $7 million extra each year from this dividend tax cut.

That isn't so surprising -- that is, that government officials would be working to pass legislation that would benefit the wealthy CEOs that put them in office in the first place. What's disturbing is that Citigroup and many other companies are sending letters to all their shareholders asking them to contact their representatives in favor of this dividend tax cut. You know, the one that will give that CEO an extra $7 million a year. $7 million that currently goes towards teachers' salaries so we don't have to fire them. $7 million that helps fund our local law enforcement agencies so they don't have to release offenders prematurely. (How's that for homeland security?) And that's just one friggin' CEO.

If you have any money in a stock mutual fund, IRA, or 401(k) or if you own stock directly, please sign the Shareholder Rebellion Statement. I've included a small portion of the statement below. And while you're at it, why not send a quick note to your representatives and explain why you're against this particular tax cut?
We are stockholders. We would benefit financially from a dividend tax cut. But we know an unfair tax proposal when we see one. We are concerned with the unfairness of these tax proposals and how they are overly skewed to the super-wealthy. The benefits of this tax cut will disproportionately go the very wealthy, those with annual incomes over $350,000 a year.
Here in Austin, we just heard that we'll probably have to fire teachers because we're in such budget trouble. Will removing billions of dollars from the state and federal budgets help matters any? I certainly don't need an extra $50 a year if it means that we have to fire teachers.

9:20 PM | link

I am so behind the times, but I finally signed up with blogrolling.com. Check out roaming»blogs to the left. It's a work in progress, so don't be offended if you don't see yourself there!

{ Thursday, March 27, 2003 }

8:44 PM | link

To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.
-- Teddy Roosevelt

{ Wednesday, March 26, 2003 }

9:21 PM | link

In a resignation letter to Colin Powell, US Embassy official Mary A. Wright said:
I strongly believe that going to war now will make the world more dangerous, not safer. In our press for military action now, we have created deep chasms in the international community and in important international organisations.
She's just one of the US government officials resigning. [via rule42]

{ Monday, March 24, 2003 }

10:54 PM | link

Could Thom Hartmann be right that if we progressives want to take back America we must take over the Democratic Party?
Alternative parties have an important place in American politics, and those in them should continue to work for their strength and vitality. They're essential as incubators of ideas and nexus points for activism. Those on the right learned this lesson well, as many groups that at times in the past had fielded their own candidates are now still intact but have also become powerful influencers of the Republican Party. Similarly, being a Green doesn't mean you can't also be a Democrat.

This is not a popular truth.

{ Sunday, March 23, 2003 }

6:30 PM | link

What better way to support our troops than to bring them home now? And in the meantime, why don't you send a book or two?

5:46 PM | link

Well, the Kucinich vs. Dean decision is now made. Kucinich didn't have the guts to vote against the bill that "expresses the unequivocal support and appreciation" for the President.

Now I'm taking a look at Carol Moseley Braun, and so far I like what I see!

{ Friday, March 21, 2003 }

2:57 AM | link

Uh-oh. This guy's looking good too. What's a progressive girl to do?
We need a new relationship between corporations and our society. Just as our founders understood the need for separation of church and state, we need to institutionalize the separation of corporations and the state. This begins with government taking the responsibility to establish the conditions under which corporations may do business in the United States, including the establishment of a federal corporate charter which describes corporate rights and responsibilities.

Corporations should be compelled to pay a fair share of taxes. If corporations shift profits offshore to avoid paying taxes, they should not be permitted to operate in the United States. The decrease in corporate tax responsibility is an indication of the rise of corporate power. According to the Institute for Policy Studies, after the 2002 tax cuts, corporations will pay in taxes an amount equivalent to 1.3% of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product. In the 1950s they paid taxes of 4.5% of the U.S. GDP. Corporations have fewer regulations, pay fewer taxes and yet have greater influence.

1:37 AM | link

If you have a chance to see Go Further or The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, see them! I'm amazed at the caliber of movie that just doesn't make it to most theaters in this country. But then again, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that Corporate America doesn't want to screen movies like this.

Also, I got to see an unfinished print of A Mighty Wind, the latest mockumentary from Christopher Guest. This one's about folk music. Friggin' hilarious. And it's not even done yet! (This one will make it to most theaters.)

{ Thursday, March 20, 2003 }

12:07 AM | link

I'm liking this guy more and more:
Tonight, for better or worse, America is at war. Tonight, every American, regardless of party, devoutly supports the safety and success of our men and women in the field. Those of us who, over the past 6 months, have expressed deep concerns about this President's management of the crisis, mistreatment of our allies and misconstruction of international law, have never been in doubt about the evil of Saddam Hussein or the necessity of removing his weapons of mass destruction.

Those Americans who opposed our going to war with Iraq, who wanted the United Nations to remove those weapons without war, need not apologize for giving voice to their conscience, last year, this year or next year. In a country devoted to the freedom of debate and dissent, it is every citizen's patriotic duty to speak out, even as we wish our troops well and pray for their safe return. Congressman Abraham Lincoln did this in criticizing the Mexican War of 1846, as did Senator Robert F. Kennedy in calling the war in Vietnam "unsuitable, immoral and intolerable."

This is not Iraq, where doubters and dissenters are punished or silenced --this is the United States of America. We need to support our young people as they are sent to war by the President, and I have no doubt that American military power will prevail. But to ensure that our post-war policies are constructive and humane, based on enduring principles of peace and justice, concerned Americans should continue to speak out; and I intend to do so.

12:01 AM | link

I found this sampler of antiwar music via Fight UNI, complete with free MP3s and lyrics. (Note: You might have to click through an ad and then find this in the audio section of Salon.)

The Peace Not War compilation CD also has samples and lyrics for antiwar music.

{ Tuesday, March 18, 2003 }

9:22 PM | link

A UT professor (who makes me wish I majored in Journalism) speaks about his fear:
It is not a fear of terrorists or weapons of mass destruction or even necessarily of this particular war, as frightening as all those things may be. I believe it is a fear of something more difficult to pin down, a fear of the forces that will be unleashed when the United States defies the world and launches a war that -- while couched in talk of protecting people from threats -- is so obviously about projecting U.S. power to achieve a kind of world domination that was never possible before...

I am scared, and I need help. We all do. Let us pledge not to let each other down -- for our own sake, and for the sake of the world.

8:03 AM | link

If war comes...
...we'll need to remind ourselves and our fellow citizens that no matter how "well" it goes militarily, it's a betrayal of law and of justice, and an incitement to bitterness and terror.

{ Thursday, March 13, 2003 }

8:29 PM | link

Today I heard that one of my favorite Austin restaurants, Rudy's is hosting a "Go America" rally, and as part of it, people who bring a bottle of French wine and pour it out on the ground will receive a free bottle of Rudy's BBQ sauce. If you'd like to call the corporate office and share your thoughts, here's the number: 512-418-0444.